Does this mean that synthesized sounds cant be 'protected' ?
That cant be right?
On 30 Sep 2012 14:59, "Neil" <djdualcore@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
I am not a lawyer but my understanding is that recordings of instruments
are by deffinition recordings of performances, not duplications of original
sounds within the instrument, even if that is the intent..
>
> On Sep 28, 2012 4:29 AM, "Thijs van severen" <thijsvanseveren@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:
>
>
>
2012/9/28 Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@email-addr-hidden>
>
> On 09/28/2012 09:43 AM, Carlos sanchiavedraz ...
>
> thanks for the tips guys
> i think i'll take the risk, but only if you promise to come visit m...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-aud...
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> follow me on my Audio & Linux blog !
>
>
> ______________________________________...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Oct 1 12:15:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 01 2012 - 12:15:02 EEST