Re: [LAU] netjack vs netjack2

On 10/03/2012 04:23 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Grant <emailgrant@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> Can anyone point me toward info describing the benefits of netjack2
>> over netjack?
>>
>
> its in the FAQ.
>
> http://jackaudio.org/faq
>
> and the wiki
>
> http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2
>
>
_NET_jack:

http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack
http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack2

netjack2 can discover slaves/master automatically (it uses multicast).
netjack2 has support for per-port latency which is transmitted between
all clients.

netjack1 is more robust regarding lost packets - that is usually only of
concern if you're sending data over a WAN. AFAIK netjack2 has no support
concerning package loss.

ciao,
robin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Oct 3 20:15:03 2012