On 11/10/12 01:46, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 01:33 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>>> i agree with a number of your critiques of patrick's approach, but i
>>> don't
>>> think that criticisms based on the content or design of a web page are
>>> anywhere nearly as important as the *potential* content.
>>>
>>> that's what is missing, for certain categories of musicians, etc.
>>
>> Speaking of which, you never replied, what kind of (missing for Linux)
>> software composers use to create quick soundtracks for TV commissions
>> :)
>>
>> And btw I'm quite concerned about *potential* content. Or, to phrase
>> it better, I'm concerned about the ability of the community to
>> continuously raise the overall quality bar.
>
> it sounds a bit lame to say i would do something about it if i only had
> the time, but it irks me something awful that all the blender movies
> still had their sound done on commercial proprietary audio systems.
+1 but it seems (and you can't really blame them on that) that they
stick to the person/studio because they like/trust them... It would be
interesting to have the sound of a blender miovie all generated with
Open Source tools: I'm thinking of the approach proposed by Andy
Farnell's in his Designing Sound... (although the latest Tears of Steel
uses a mixed approach)
>
> i'm pretty sure with two or three people ganging up on this, we could
> come up with a kick-ass movie sound design. and in decent surround, too :)
I agree. But it would have to be a focused job, so to say.
>
> maybe for their next movie in 2013... if anyone plans to make a move,
> let me know - with half a year of advance notice, i could probably find
> time to join.
Not sure what move should be made but it would be cool.
Lorenzo.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Oct 11 12:15:03 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 11 2012 - 12:15:03 EEST