Julien Claassen <julien@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Hi Eric!
> If you have any questions about Nama/Ecasound, just shoot! This
> weekend I will be a little busy, but when I'm in, I'll have a look
> for e-mail.
Thanks for the offer! I haven't gotten a chance to look more closely
at Nama, but am thinking more about what I want based on my existing
workflow.
I like using makefiles because I can make small edits to code, and when
I run "make", it'll only rebuild the part of a project which changed.
To restate my original question:
For editing audio files, I'd like a workflow similar to how I
hack on C projects: I edit code and run "make". I edit more
code, and run "make" again... Each invocation of "make" only
builds the parts of the project that's changed in the past.
I also didn't realize this earlier: there is a lot of functionality
from SoX that have grown on me in the past few months which I've
grown very accustomed and dependent on :)
If I continue using SoX, I will definitely combine it with ecasound to
fill the gaps SoX has (e.g. LADSPA/LV2 support).
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Nov 22 12:15:03 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 22 2012 - 12:15:03 EET