Re: [LAU] A surprisingly stupid RT priority question

From: Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Dec 08 2012 - 21:19:59 EET

On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> nice has absolutely nothing to do with this, and if it has any effect, it is
> accidental and should not be relied on.

I know that's your stock answer whenever someone mentions nice, but if
the OP is talking about SCHED_OTHER processes, nice does play a role.

But if the OP really wants to play with fire, try "chrt". Keep a
shell open with higher priority in case the process never blocks, so
you can kill it. "taskset" might also be useful for multicore
machines.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Dec 9 00:15:01 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 09 2012 - 00:15:01 EET