Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

From: Joe Hartley <jh@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 23 2012 - 20:07:19 EET

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
> > Given that most audio interfaces will perform better at 48 kHz than at
> > 44.1

http://xkcd.com/285/

I've always had fine results running my Delta1010s at 44.1kHz, since I
only do audio destined for CD and wanted to avoid the re-sampling.
Why would running them at 48kHz make them perform better?

-- 
======================================================================
       Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@email-addr-hidden
 Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Dec 23 20:15:04 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 23 2012 - 20:15:04 EET