Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

From: Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Dec 24 2012 - 05:47:12 EET

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Chris Bannister
<cbannister@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> So artifacts (transient peaks) on the trailing or leading edges of a
> square wave is not a form of ringing?

In this case, yes. They're a fundamental aspect of any bandlimited
signal and you'll see them even when the filters are all FIR. You can
see also them on any scope-- so long as the scope has a greater
bandwidth than the squarewave you're inspecting (perfect squarewaves
require infinite frequencies, and so do not actually exist).

And, like I said, you can massage the frequency response of a filter
to hide the ripples and overshoots by spreading the Gibbs effect over
a wider spectral area, giving the illusion that they're not there when
you look at it on a scope. That's mostly a trick of presentation.
Your ear doesn't care (though your circuits might, if you're trying to
limit the analog signal range).

You could also have a filter that really is adding ringing, but that's
something different.

Monty
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Dec 24 08:15:03 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 24 2012 - 08:15:03 EET