On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> On Sun, December 30, 2012 7:12 pm, Devin Anderson wrote:
>
> >
> > JACK *could* deal with this issue, but:
> >
> > 1.) It would be better if the functionality was independent of JACK.
> > 2.) I don't think the issue is JACK's responsibility.
>
> Quite honestly, it does not seem to be something that _should_ be done by
> ALSA either, because properly joining two devices would mean an extra
> buffer (and latency).
this is not true, if they are clock-synced.
> It seems that the reality is that each device needs
> to be dealt with as a separate device. So if it is not Jack's problem then
> a second jacklike server that exposes the ports as jack clients is needed
> and expected. So using something like zita-a2j would be the "correct" way
> of doing things.
>
if they are not clock synced, then yes.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Dec 31 20:15:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 31 2012 - 20:15:02 EET