On Sun, January 13, 2013 8:59 pm, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 04:11:33PM -0500, Brett McCoy wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Chris Bannister
>> <cbannister@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 09:53:45AM -0800, Len Ovens wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, January 13, 2013 9:51 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> >> > I suspect
>> >> > we are still monkeys.
>> >>
>> >> Good thing you said monkeys, Apes are smart enough to be insulted...
>> >
>> > Just to nitpick here, but we are closer to chimpanzees than apes or
>> > monkeys, in fact apparently, chimpanzees are more closely related to
>> us
>> > than apes or monkeys.
>>
>> Chimpanzees *are* apes!
>
> Ahh %$#@, for some stupid reason I was thinking of gibbons and orangutans
> and
> gorillas.
>
> Huge apologies Len!
None needed. In the context I wasn't saying one mammal was closer to human
than the other, just that monkeys are not very bright.... maybe that makes
them closer to human after all.
-- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Mon Jan 14 16:15:04 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 14 2013 - 16:15:04 EET