Re: [LAU] guitarix

From: hermann meyer <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Mon Feb 04 2013 - 16:24:40 EET

Am 04.02.2013 08:37, schrieb hermann meyer:
> Am 02.02.2013 20:23, schrieb Jeremy Jongepier:
>> On 02/02/2013 01:21 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>>> hi *!
>>>
>>>
>>> today, i checked out guitarix for the first time, while working on a
>>> clean guitar track that needed some cojonification. built straight from
>>> git w/o issues (except for the fact that it does require a ladspa
>>> header
>>> even if explicitly asked not build ladspa plugins).
>>>
>
> That's because guitarix is a ladspa host as well, so the ladspa
> headers are required even when you disable the build of the ladspa plugs.

Ah, well, I just checked that we have disable the check for the ladspa
header when --no-ladspa is used, indeed a bug, I have correct it now in
GIT,
thanks for the hint. ( Even if it takes me a while to understand what
you mean :-) , my foul)

greets
hermann
>>> after two hours of experimenting, i feel compelled to share my
>>> impression:
>>>
>>> FUCK YEAH!
>>>
>>> many thanks for sharing this awesome tool.
>>>
>>> best,
>>>
>>>
>>> jörn
>>>
> I'm glad to hear you found it useful. :-)
>
> greets
> hermann
>>>
>>
>> Good stuff ey?
>> I'm working on my workshop application for LAC2013, using your
>> electric guitar with Linux audio. Starring guitarix of course :)
>>
>> Jeremy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Feb 4 16:15:04 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 04 2013 - 16:15:04 EET