On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:56 AM, J. Liles wrote:
> The biggest problem is that there are more people talking than there are
> people doing. There are a 100 people to tell you this or that UI is shit,
> but absolutely no-one to step up and do something about it.
That would be an exaggeration, although I see where you are coming from.
Now, this:
> With very few exceptions, LAD software is not
> written for 'the users', it is written for the needs of the developers and
> gifted to the community without warranty.
kinda contradicts this:
> Nobody said the goal of Linux Audio was to replace Non-Linux
> Audio. The goal of Linux Audio is simply to provide free-software
> alternatives for people who give a shit (this group consists mostly of the
> LAD developers themselves).
And then...
> Yes, the many standards/approches can be
> annoying.. But since when is diversity a bad thing?
Since dawn of times, J.
Creating a complex product requires certain expertise. Acquiring that
expertise is a matter of time and devotion, hence the amount of people
having it is rather small. Divided, they cannot make usable software
fast enough.
> And the problem of there being no such thing as an open source graphic
> designer or UX expert applies to all free-software, not just LAD.
I really love how bravely you make use of hyperbole :) I'm not sure if
you ever stumbled upon 100% lack of imagination, but I assure you that
there will be people who will understand you literally. And that would
be quite a disaster.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 6 04:15:04 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 06 2013 - 04:15:04 EET