On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM, cunnilinux himself wrote:
> the problem is the fact that marketologists don't think so.
> they think that techinical side should be hidden as much as possible,
> and the user should interact with one or two magic buttons only.
"I'm an artist. I speak in hyperbole" (c) The Oatmeal
Right? :)
Of course, you can always try to convince Louigi that he needs
separate channel ports in gladish on stage. Because, dontcherknow,
half the live session should be spent on connecting each L and R
output separately.
So, basically,
s/the problem/presumably, the problem/
s/the fact/according to my assumption/
s/marketologists/some marketologists/
s/technical side should be hidden as much as possible/software should
not get in the way/
s/interact with one or two magic buttons only/spend as little time on
boring work as possible/
Is that UNIX enough for ya? :)
Personally, I salute to people who think that e.g. client/server
architecture of LinuxSampler is great and should be directly exposed
to users. I'll never be half as cool. I'm a complete and utter bore
who never gets any life. Unlike the sparkling minds of true UNIX gurus
who get all the girls/boys, because talking about low-level stuff is
so frigging sexy :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 6 12:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 06 2013 - 12:15:02 EET