Well, even in a small company the developers spend a lot more time in meetings than the typical hobbyist.
Other than that...
Thanks,
Bill Gribble
On Feb 6, 2013, at 6:44, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> "i work in a big fancy datacenter. so, the question is:
>> should i treat about 3/4 servers there as 'hobbyist' ?"
>>
>> Sure, why not?
>> "hobbyist" refers to how something was done,
>> not how it is then being used.
>
> i don't think that it is accurate anymore to think of the development process for the linux kernel as "hobbyist".
>
> it is probably a better description of the application space, but even there, it doesn't apply across the board.
>
> people who don't develop software (and even some who do) sometimes imagine that the process inside a company than actually pays its developers is radically different from the one that involves hobbyists. the differences are not as dramatic as you might think, and in the case of particularly small companies, there can effectively be no difference at all.
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 6 16:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 06 2013 - 16:15:02 EET