If I understand it correctly, you can compile free VSTs for Linux, you
just can't give away their SDK source code without going through the
form on Steinberg's website (just like with the Mac and Windows
versions). VSTSDK, the (fairly separate) component I had a problem
with, is legitimately open-sourced and Linux-centric improvements can
be made. I'm not seeing a problem here, unless there's something I'm
overlooking (always very possible with me :))
-Louis
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<alexandre.prokoudine@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Simon Wise wrote:
>
>> It is not a technical point about only using free software ... it is a very
>> real copyright issue. VST is owned by Steinberg so unless you are willing to
>> ignore/reject Copyright and IP laws (which would be really problematic
>> regarding your other points about encouraging commercial software on Linux)
>> then you are very limited in how VST can be distributed in Linux. To change
>> that you must convince Steinberg to change the license they offer. A freely
>> distributed program obviously cannot pay Steinberg for every downloaded copy
>> .. so no license .. so the potential user must compile their own version of
>> VST support.
>>
>> See Dave Philips article ...
>>
>> http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000192
>
> This is an article from goddamn 2007! :) Long before VeSTige came about.
>
> Alexandre Prokoudine
> http://libregraphicsworld.org
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 7 12:15:01 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 07 2013 - 12:15:02 EET