Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

From: <gerald.mwangi@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Feb 11 2013 - 00:48:26 EET
Hi



-- Sent from my HP TouchPad

On 10.02.2013 23:30, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hiddennuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:


On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:05 PM, <gerald.mwangi@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
Auto mode for JACK latency is a good idea.
 I have another proposition: a dedicated graphical front-end for jack session. It could help users setup their workflow , by providing a list of all the jack aware programs installed, categorized by type (sampler, daw, synth). The program should aid in setting up a project , eg firing up ardour with several tracks, firing up synths (lv2 instruments/hosts incl) with presets selectable from the front-end with a preview sound. The front-end could trigger the synth in question with a midi note when selecting a preset. Lv2 plugins, that is pure audio effects, could also listed with the ability to directly send a signal from the audio interface through the selected plugin to quickly hear what it does. One could then associate the selected plugin with, say a track in ardour, and another plugin with a track in hydrogen or so.

what you are describing is basically the "monolithic app" experience (from a user perspective) but created using a set of independent applications and processes.

speaking personally, i think there are better things to do with our time.
 

Well just for the initialization of the project. The diversity experience of the multiple programs , ecosystem shall still be preserved
Gerald

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Feb 11 04:15:01 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 11 2013 - 04:15:02 EET