On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:13:02PM +0100, Kjetil Matheussen wrote:
> Paul Davis:
>
> >if you're not willing to participate in the managed handling of a
> >bug, i'm not interested in your bug.
'Your bug' is a bit missing the point. It's the author's bug, not
the user's.
> If there is a bug in my software, I want people to report it any way
> they like (as long as it's electronically). Bug reports should always
> be appreciated. I think/hope this goes for many other developers.
It's certainly like that here.
A bugtracker is a tool used by a developer or a team much in
the same way as an electronic or paper agenda is. If I want
a meeting with some person I'll call him/her or maybe his/her
secretary. I don't write myself into his/her agenda or todo-
list.
If some project gets a bug report via email or a mailing list
it's a simple matter for a developer to enter it into the bug
tracker of his/her choice. Or write it down on a post-it (TM).
It probably takes less time than reading, evaluating and
assigning it, which has to be done anyway.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Feb 12 00:15:12 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 12 2013 - 00:15:12 EET