Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Wed Feb 13 2013 - 01:58:40 EET

On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 18:27 -0500, Al Thompson wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 11:31 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > When I sold my work, I also delivered the ownership of this work. When I
> > sold a graphic, it would have been unethically for me to still own
> > nearly all rights for the usage of this graphic.
> Keep in mind that there are different meanings to "selling your work."
> Take a song, as an example.
>
> Let's say that I've recorded and released an album.
>
> Let's say that some big-name pop star buys the album. He buys it for
> $10. That gives him the right to listen to it. He can't record it
> himself. I still own all the rights to the usage of the song.
>
> Let's say that he likes the song, and wants to record it and release it
> on his next album. I then agree to give him a "mechanical license"
> for a few cents per album he releases. I still own all the rights to
> the usage of the song.
>
> Then, let's say that he wants to be able to do more with the song - he
> can buy the copyright, and then all the rights to the song will be his.
> I have no rights to the song from that point on.

AFAIK in Germany OTOH if you go to a photographer to make a passport
photo you are only allowed to use it for passports, driving licenses
etc., but you are not allowed to use it as cover for your next record.
The photographer has got the right to archive the photo of you, without
your permission.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 13 04:15:07 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 13 2013 - 04:15:07 EET