Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

On 02/12/2013 06:40 PM, drew Roberts wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2013 18:27:53 Al Thompson wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 11:31 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> When I sold my work, I also delivered the ownership of this work. When I
>>> sold a graphic, it would have been unethically for me to still own
>>> nearly all rights for the usage of this graphic.
>> Keep in mind that there are different meanings to "selling your work."
>> Take a song, as an example.
>>
>> Let's say that I've recorded and released an album.
>>
>> Let's say that some big-name pop star buys the album. He buys it for
>> $10. That gives him the right to listen to it. He can't record it
>> himself. I still own all the rights to the usage of the song.
> Only because the law gives you an unnatural monopoly.

You can only believe that I have an "unnatural monopoly" over something
I created if you actually believe that everyone has equal claims on my
life/time/effort as I do.

>
> Somehow fashion designers manage to make what seems to be decent money
> designing original fashions even where they do not get copyright protection
> for their fashion designs.
>
> Is it that fashion designers are more astute when it comes to getting paid for
> hteir creations? Are they more intelligent than songwriters?
>

You are falling into Kinsella's trap of believing that only hard goods
have value.

-- 
---
My bands, CD projects, music, news, and pictures:
  http://www.lateralforce.com
 
 
My blog, with commentary on a variety of things, including audio,
mixing, equipment, etc, is at:
   http://audioandmore.wordpress.com
 
 
Staat heißt das kälteste aller kalten Ungeheuer.  Kalt lügt es auch;
und diese Lüge kriecht aus seinem Munde: 'Ich, der Staat, bin das Volk.'
                                                - [Friedrich Nietzsche]
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user