Re: [LAU] Some new Bach

From: Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 14 2013 - 20:35:34 EET

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:16:27PM +0530, Rustom Mody wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Folderol <folderol@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > This displays the very rigidity I don't like. But as I said, it's a matter
> > of personal preference.
> >
>
> I wonder how much is the performer and how much the original
> composer-intention?

I can't imagine how the initial 'Magnificat' could be played
in any other way than 'a tempo giusto' without breaking it.
It's a collective outburst of joy, leaving little room for
hesitation.

Herreweghe tends to maintain rather strict tempo even for
romantic era orchestral music, maybe that's one reason why
I like his work in general. Rubato (in the broad sense) for
me is something that can be done by a soloist or a string
quartet (within reason - it becomes slimy rather easily).
For a full orchestra plus choir it mostly sounds fake to me.

I once mixed a live broadcast of the Magnificat with the
same conductor, players and singers. There was little to
do during the initial intro - for once we had decent
soundcheck - except for hearing it happen, and I found it
difficult to sit still in my chair :-)

Ciao,

-- 
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 14 20:15:14 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 14 2013 - 20:15:14 EET