Re: [LAU] Some new Bach

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Julien Claassen <julien@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Hello!
> I once heard, that the changes between loud and quiet sections in
> Mozart's music generally correspond to some rhythm in brain wave patterns.
> the timing is supposed to be right. But that was years and years ago, so I
> couldn't quote you an article. but I'm almost sure it was in connection
> with one of those experiments, where they took three groups, folding paper,
> cutting shapes into it and then have them imagine, what the final result
> would look like. I think they were tested on Mozart, Philip Glas and no
> music. Coming to the conclusion, that the Mozart group had the best
> results. I can't remember, how the remaining two groups were ranked. - Oh
> yes, they were all started together with no music, so that there was a way
> to compare them.
>

Google for Mozart effect and you will find things like
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281386/
Also stuff trying to debunk stuff like the above!

About the hard metal (if thats what its called) version of Beethoven's
moonlight,
Ive collected some preliminary thoughts on my blog:
http://blog.languager.org/2011/02/cs-education-is-fat-and-weak-3.html

Note its part of a series on CS education; music is only incidental.
Still if any of you have thoughts/suggestions, Id like to hear

Rusi

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Feb 16 20:15:05 2013