On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 06:04:24PM -1000, david wrote:
> On 02/16/2013 05:10 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >Of course, if you were running a truly minimum desktop, you don't even
> >need synaptic because apt-get is installed anyway.
>
> I find synaptic a much-easier way to manage packages than the
> cryptic command lines of apt-get or dpkg. For instance, I can easily
> see what a particular package recommends and decide if I want to
> also include one or more the recommendations.
That what "apt-cache policy <pkgname>", and "apt-cache show <pkgname>"
are for. I don't see how you can call the command lines crptic!
Also my comment was just pointing out that if you have synaptic
installed you can't honestly claim that you have a "truly minimum
desktop"
-- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun Feb 17 08:15:04 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 17 2013 - 08:15:04 EET