On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:02:49AM +0000, Ben Bell wrote:
> 1) Older kernels sound much warmer than newer ones.
>
> 2) Kernels compiled by hand on the machine they run on sound less sterile
> than upstream distro provided ones which also tend to have flabby low
> end response and bad stereo imaging.
>
> 3) As if it needed saying, gcc4 is a disaster for sound quality. I mean,
> seriously if you want decent audio and you use gcc4 you may as well be
> recording with a tin can microphone.
>
> 4) Kernels sound better after they've been worn in a bit. Don't expect your
> newly built 2.4 kernel to have that warm sound until you've run with it
> for a few weeks, but for a really classy sound here's a trick: compile the
> kernel and then put it somewhere safe (ext2 partition, obviously) to mellow
> for a month and then boot into it at the last minute before you start
> recording an important session. Your clients will thank you.
5) Make sure to disable all but one CPU and any hyperthreading.
Parallel processing produces a very nasty form of crosstalk. [1]
Even non-audio data (e.g. network packets) could leak into your
signals if you leave it enabled.
[1] This is why Jack1 usually sounds more transparent than Jack2.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Fri Mar 8 16:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 08 2013 - 16:15:02 EET