On 03/22/2013 08:24 PM, Frank Kober wrote:
>> De : Louigi Verona<louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden>
>
>> I did not revert to jack1, but I am using a fixed version. I have no desire to revert to jack1 just to fix seq24, especially that you say it still does not work :)
>
>
> Hm jack transport+seq24 in jack2 works for me even without the process_callback modification. Not your case?
>
>
>> Is there anyone working on seq24 these days?
>
>
> I don't think so....which is very unfortunate, some time ago there was a nice team gathering around the project though.
No devs who want to help you out here?
Non-sequencer has more future imo, new version is on it's way. It's
gonna be nice I think.
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Mar 23 00:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 23 2013 - 00:15:03 EET