>________________________________
> De : Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
>On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Frank Kober <goemusic@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
>>it didn't work for me. Maybe I'm wrong but if I understood correctly, recent jack1 transport no longer goes into Jack_Transport_Starting state before going to Jack_Transport_Rolling (this was deliberately dropped), but seq24 currently needs this to start off with jack transport.
>>
>
>what leads you to make this claim?
>
>nothing has been changed in jack1 transport in a VERY LONG time.
OK so this is clearly my bad. The reason for this 'claim' is a discussion on seq24-devel ml between Torben Hohn and Guido Scholz about future versions of jack, in which the sync callback in seq24 should be dropped, because it will no longer work. I may have misunderstood parts of it. The other reason is that when I tested it with jack1 (quite some time ago) seq24 didn't respond to jack transport start, and I didn't see it going into the transport_starting state. So the above came from that, and now I know I made a false conclusion, but I don't think I dreamed it.
Sorry then
Frank
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Mar 23 00:15:04 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 23 2013 - 00:15:04 EET