Re: [LAU] What is the best MP3 encoder?

From: Chris Bannister <cbannister@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 29 2013 - 04:31:54 EET

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:31:24PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> 48Khz will not help at all when it comes to artifacts and the raw
> material is usually in 44.1 (and sometimes in 96 or 192) anyway.
> Speaking about bitrates higher than what the human ear can hear,
> here is some cool info about high bit rates:
>
> http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

This is highly controversal amongst audio enthusiasts. (Don't mean the
link, just the subject.)

Interesting discussion:
http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/13/03/22/178213/can-you-really-hear-the-difference-between-lossless-lossy-audio

also on this list, there has been some "discussion"

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Mar 29 04:15:03 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 29 2013 - 04:15:03 EET