Re: [LAU] eyes verses ears

Yes Ralf and J. your distinction between measuring and just
visualizing makes lots of sense to me. And Julien, I think you are
basically saying the same thing. A graphical tool may make it quicker
and easier to isolate problems and take measurements to improve audio
quality.

Monty, I'm going to play a little devil's advocate here.
I wouldn't say that anyone needs to throw away their measurement tools
when engineering equipment for best performance, but I have heard of
blind listening comparisons where audiofiles couldn't reliably tell
the difference between two given studio amplifiers, or between given
sets of speaker cables.
I recognize that "just listen" may be a trite way of dismissing valid
points, but isn't listening the primary goal here?
But I do agree with you that if using a visual representation helps
more quickly and accurately improve the auditory experience, then
that's a good thing.

Interesting stuff
Rusty

On 7/4/13, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net> wrote:
> Visualisation is helpful for troubleshooting, if e.g. something does
> sound distorted, then taking a look at a meterbridge could be
> timesaving.
> Phase correlation does ensure that the phases are ok for airplay.
> However, visualisation isn't needed, but could be helpful.
>
> For analog recordings measurements at least are needed for bias
> calibration.
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Jul 5 12:15:03 2013