Re: [LAU] kernel release: which one?

Quoting hermann meyer <brummer-@web.de>:

> Am 24.08.2013 14:25, schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>> On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 14:13 +0200, hermann meyer wrote:
>>> CONFIG_NO_HZ is available, but CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL still isn't
>> But it was. From a private mail a while ago:
>>
>> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 19:01 +0200, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
>>> jack@email-addr-hidden /home/jack $ uname -a
>>> Linux tor 3.10.6-rt3-1-rt #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Tue Aug 13 13:59:13 CEST
>>> 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>> jack@email-addr-hidden /home/jack $ zgrep _HZ /proc/config.gz
>>> CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=y
>>> # CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC is not set
>>> CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y
>>> # CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not set
>>> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
>>> # CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set
>>> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
>>> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
>>> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
>>> CONFIG_HZ=1000
>>> jack@email-addr-hidden /home/jack $
>> I was willing to test the kernel when it's enabled, but the kernel did
>> cause an issue on my machine already when it was disabled.
>>
> Here is what I get
>
> uname -a
> Linux box 3.10.9-rt5 #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Fri Aug 23 11:14:14 CEST 2013
> i686 GNU/Linux
>
> zgrep _HZ /proc/config.gz
> CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC=y
> # CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE is not set
> # CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
> CONFIG_HZ=1000
>
> This is plain vanila +rt patch.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

There are some reasons for not having to set some of these high
resolution timers, especially if you are using MIDI through Jack. See
-
http://www.linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=10058&p=44078#p43871

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Aug 25 00:15:04 2013