Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency

From: Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jan 01 2014 - 22:03:48 EET

On Wed, 1 Jan 2014, Harry van Haaren wrote:

> Latency below ~3ms isn't percievable at all IMO: most will agree.
> Why not run jack at 64 frames, 2 buffers? That'll achieve approx
> 3ms (on 44.1kHz and 48kHz).. which is fine for the purpose?

Unless it is an internal audio IF... My experience with HDA stuff is, the
minimum is 128 frames before Jack will even start. Though 64 frames may
work with 3 buffers. Still quite good though. Usable with guitarix for
example. 

--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jan 2 00:15:05 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 02 2014 - 00:15:05 EET