On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:45:03 +0000
Q <lists@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> My point was, there is nothing inherently polite/rude about either
> posting style. However, bottom-posting IS very inconvenient to read.
> If trimming is so important and bottom-posting breaks without it, why
> quote ANYTHING at all.
>
> After all, what's quoted in bottom-posting is incomplete chunks and
> no longer a full record of all that's gone before (which isn't an
> issue that top-posting by design has to have), which makes it even
> more inconvenient, because if you need context you have to flick
> backwards and forwards between different messages to get the full
> picture.
>
> The arguments in favour of bottom-posting are illogical.
How would you respond to several distinct parts of a longish mail in
your top-posting style?
Regards,
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jan 2 20:15:05 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 02 2014 - 20:15:05 EET