On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 03:51:41PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
> I had calibrated -18dBFS on all of them to the same source (a 1KHz sine,
> which I believe to be 0 dBu). That's how I found out about the rubber
> controls effect in the first place.
O dBu ? So you measured the line inputs, not the mics ?
On a real pro device the line input would bypass the mic
preamp. OTOH, on most cheap cards it's just attenuated and
fed into the preamp - the perfect recipe for bad S/N.
> I also did two another measurements, setting the gain-dial of each
> devices at minimum and maximum. The 18i6 still came out worst.. but that
> is not too unexpected. The gain range of the 18i6 is about -10dB ..
> +30dB (per specs it should be -10..+36), while on the other two it's
> -20dB .. +20dB.
'Gain' for an A/D converter is not really defined - the ratio of a
purely numerical value (in the digital domain) and a physical one
(the actual input voltage) is has a physical dimension (1/Volt).
So that is not a 'gain' in the usual sense.
For a 'gain' spec to have any meaning at all
* it should be the analog gain from the input connector
to the analog inputs of the converter chip (but don't
assume that is what the specs mean),
AND
* you need to know the actual full scale voltage of the
converter chip.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Jan 8 20:15:13 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 08 2014 - 20:15:13 EET