Re: [LAU] Latency and USB interfaces

[Robin Gareus]
>On 01/08/2014 05:54 PM, James Stone wrote:
>> Also, how meaningful is the reported jackd buffer size in terms of
>> actual latency?
>
>jack buffer size is only meaningful within jack.

I was under the impression that in an optimal setup (jackd -d alsa -d
hw:$X), the jack buffer/period setup is identical to what the driver
uses to communicate with the hardware.

In fact, examining the ALSA driver parameters[*] while jackd is
running confirms this for both the UCG-102 USB and the ice1712-based
PCI interface here.

Tim

[*] /proc/asound/card$X/pcm0[cp]/sub0/[hs]w_params
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jan 9 16:15:01 2014