Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch

Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 23:57:04 schrieb Renato:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:29 +0100
> raf <rmouneyres@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'd recommend to create a tempo map (vs timestreching which would
> > lead to artefacts) As you mention recording in ardour, you could use
> > it to create the tempo map,
>
> hi, what is a "tempo map" and how do you create it in ardour? couldn't
> find anything about it. I don't want to manually enter single tempo
> changes in ardour

I think he means putting several decreasing tempo markers for your accelerando to ardour's timeline, then re-record hydrogen while both sync to jack transport - then hydrogen should follow ardour's tempo and there would be no need for timestretching...

Edgar

>
> meanwhile I'm looking into klick, it seems it should work (though can't
> get it to sync to jack transport ATM) - but this way the tempo changes
> will not get recorded into ardour... i.e. every time I press play I
> should also somehow start klick...
>
> renato
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Feb 15 12:15:02 2014