>> That I think is a personal call Ralf, primarily because at 48 Khz, your
>> anti-aliasing filters had better be very very good brick walls by the time
>> you get above 24Khz in input content
>
> Can anyone point out a commercially available microphone used in the
> audio recording domain which will actually pic frequencies above 20 kHz?
>
> Likewise can anyone point out any commercially available speaker used in
> the audio reproduction domain which will actually reproduce frequencies
> above 20 kHz?
my roughly 20 years old genelec s30 are specified to go to >25khz,
mundorf amt tweeters go up to 41khz, adam s4x-h are specified do go up
to 50khz.
the mundorf amt's can be used for PA speakers, a college of mine once
used them to build a line array
> If the audio produced is made for fruition of humans it makes absolutely
> no sense to try and capture or reproduce anything above 20kHz, and for
> average individuals 15kHz would probably more than enough.
but of course you need to distinguish between distribution and
production, were you can benefit from frequency headroom.
> And in case anyone is tempted to state that even if we don't hear them
> frequencies above 20kHz influence the way we hear or 'perceive' music,
> please also attach any _scientific_ study/paper/evidence (e.g.
> large-scale blind tests etc. not anecdotal evidence) to such statement.
>
> Lorenzo.
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Mar 17 00:15:09 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 17 2014 - 00:15:10 EET