> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:59:54 +0100
> From: clemens@email-addr-hidden
> To: dj_kaza@email-addr-hidden
> CC: linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> Subject: Re: [LAU] Basic Bash/Find and batch CLI questions.
>
> Kaza Kore wrote:
> > find ./ -type d -exec ~/bin/flac2mp3 "{}" \;
> >
> > So find is passing all directories, via the type argument
>
> The type argument is a filter.
Yep got that much. Filter for Directories.
> > find is not actually being used for any searching, just to recursively send all folders, right?
>
> The default action is to print what has been found.
But there is no search term. Therefore I take it it's an assumed -name *.* and passes all directory paths (but no filenames) to the executed file.
> With -exec, the specified program is executed for each found item.
Each found item? So I could use [-type f -iname *.flac] and it would run through on each file in turn? (Been meaning to test this out, which is what I was trying when I came across the problem answered below. Not had a chance again yet. Obviously I'd have to at least remove the [cd "${1}" && for f in *.flac; do] section but replace it with what? Are programs such as ffmpeg and lame not designed to accept a list of files? I thought many Linux programs were designed to accept exactly this as input...
I'll try and do some experimenting after dinner. At least if my headache goes a bit...
>
> > I don't understand the bit after the exec call
>
> {} is the file name, ; ends the command to be executed.
>
Thanks. That's pretty much the conclusions I had come to. Although still need to read up on bash again as how this then relates to $f etc still confused me a bit...
> > $ find -iname *wey*
> > find: paths must precede expression: weyheyhey !! - Little Batty Foo Foo (ft. TechDiff's Modest Loft Conversion remix).mp3
>
> The shell expands *wey* into multiple arguments, but -iname expects only one.
> It worked in the parent directory because *wey* could not be expanded there.
>
> To prevent expansion, quote it:
>
> $ find . -iname '*wey*'
>
Still not sure while it baulks with *wey* and not with *wan* but thanks both you and James, using quotation marks cured that problem when testing earlier so all is good on that front.
I do agree having a single call to the script and the search-term (find command) being included in that would make sense, rather than having it called the method I currently am. Pretty sure most CLI commands can be used in bash but again the small bits I once learn have been lost to me currently, so more reading and testing needed!
And thanks other James, will look into mp3gain, it's also the first solution I found with Google. I know the subject of RMS normalisation has come up on here a few times so should probably spend some time searching the archives for this mail-list for that one (part of the reason I felt a little cheeky asking but as I had other questions too... ;) )
Dale.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Mar 23 16:15:03 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 23 2014 - 16:15:03 EET