On Tue, 13 May 2014 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014, Peter Lutek wrote:
>
> > ok... looks like my non-rt kernel gives me a larger list of available
> > governors (and, curiously, a lower maximum available CPU speed) than my rt
> > kernel, which has only the powersave and performance governors as well as a
> > higher max CPU speed. perhaps "performance" on the RT kernel will be best....
>
> Hmm, do you have "boost" enabled in your bios? You may wish to turn it off
> as non-os control will change speeds on you if temperature gets too high.
> That may be why the top speed shows different. Boost is new on the intel
> chips, so if your system is even a year old, probably no boost.
>
> I have not installed an RT kernel since 2.4 or 2.6 as the lowlatency
> kernel has allowed me good stable performance and still has all the
> drivers I have needed on any of my personal machines I have tested. The
> generic kernel is not good enough for me though.
>
> --
> Len Ovens
> www.ovenwerks.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
cpufreq-set takes the arguments --min FREQ and --max FREQ which allow you to set the minimum and maximum allowed frequencies for your current scaling governor, though I don't know if fixing the frequency to a given value within the ondemand or performance governors differ anyhow to the userspace setting.
Good luck!
-- Federico Galland <federicogalland@email-addr-hidden> _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed May 14 04:15:02 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 14 2014 - 04:15:02 EEST