Re: [LAU] Sound Chip as a synthesizer on Linux. Thoughts, ideas?

On July 10, 2014 10:59:17 AM Fede wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have a question on a topic not frequently addressed here, but why not just
> asking?
>
> Do any of you run some old sound blaster/adlib/gravis ultrasound card? I
> mean the ones with chip synthesizers.
>
> Just started reading a lot about the commodore 64's SID and just found out
> lot of my childhood's games actually run the audio on actual synths, which
> freaked me out totally.

Probably because there was no way to produce sample driven audio from SID.
Actually, that's not entirely true:

Later in this thread I think Len refers to the General Instrument AY-3-8910.

Ironically both the Commodore SID and the AY-3-8910 *can* produce
 sampled audio, the SID in two different ways:

1) Use the SID's 12-bit Pulse Width Modulators to produce PWM audio.
Drawback: Maximum operating frequency is around 3Khz, which gets into
 the audio, so you need a low-pass filter down there.

2) Use the SID's or the AY-3-8910's Volume registers to produce sampled audio.
(Set the SID oscillators for 'DC' - the highest f number, or the GI's volume
 mode to a 'DC' envelope.)
Drawback - it's only 4-bit audio samples.

>
> It would be nice to have any kind of synth chip running as a hardware
> synthesizer on a linux computer, really. In my country, the only PCI card
> with an OPL compatible chip is the YMF744b, which seems to be supported by
> ALSA. Getting that would mean starting to search for methods to create .o3
> (instrument patches) files to be loaded to the card, for which there seems
> to be no dedicated native linux software. Maybe through DOSbox?
>
> Anyway. These are still just ideas, because the topic is very vast; there
> are lots of different sound chips, and I'm even considering getting a c64
> to use it as a sort of assembler csound, if that makes sense.
>
> People familiar to the demoscene are aware of these kind of devices'
> powerfulness, but most of that that I've witnessed is tempered scale based
> and traditionaly rhythmically structured (and they really rock it that
> way), but it would be interesting (to me, anyway) to experiment creating
> sound textures and evolving timbres on these sort of hybrid soft-hard
> synths. *I might be missing lots of important details on the subject*

As Len mentions later, as far as the actual desired sound produced,
 virtually any sound and envelope and filtering you could ever want
 can be done 'softly' these days - take a look at the open source
 xsynth or zynaddsubfx, they are very 'analog-like'.

However, I think it's great that people today still want to dig in and learn
 hardware register level programming, even retro style.

Programming sound chips in those days was a total riot - F.U.N.

There's the question of what you are interfacing these chips to.
Embedded MPU? PIC chip etc?
Or PC driven? For experimenting these days you'll probably need
 something like a USB kit like a Velmann kit.
Of course you can stick with the original computer like the C64.
Even interface an IBM to it, so the C64 acts as a command-driven
 'sound server'.

F.U.N.

Tim.

>
> So, do you people have any way to enlighten me on this? Any thoughts or
> ideas?
>
> Thanks a lot, really.
>
> Fede
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Jul 11 08:15:01 2014