Re: [LAU] [Bulk] Re: Session management with NSM

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Sep 04 2014 - 20:33:58 EEST

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 23:09 +0545, Kazakore wrote:
> On 04/09/14 20:34, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > IIUC NSM doesn't care about the jackd settings. When Qtractor also
> > ignores the settings, expects that they are the same as when an audio
> > track was recorded, then Qtractor _does not_ support NSM session
> > management. I start my sessions by scripts and don't use a session
> > manager and it seems that my decision to do so is good.
>
> Do you honestly not see how much of a fallacy that statement is? If not
> please mull it over for a moment, I'm sure it will come to you how two
> programs, both not controlling/listening to a third programs settings
> has absolutely nothing to do with their functioning together!
>
> Dale.

If jackd is started with settings that cause another latency, than the
latency that was used, when an audio recording was done with Qtractor,
then audio and MIDI tracks get out of sync. So jackd has to be started
with the same latency. If the session manager shouldn't start jackd, the
latency settings could be incorrect.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Sep 5 00:15:02 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 05 2014 - 00:15:02 EEST