Re: [LAU] How-to for simple recording for 3.5 hours?

From: David <david@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Sep 27 2014 - 02:08:04 EEST

sox works a treat, in my experience

On 27/09/14 08:13, Will Godfrey wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:48:55 +0000
> Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:42:40PM +0000, Jonathan E Brickman wrote:
>>
>>> Last Sunday I set up my laptop for a 3.5-hour recording session, Audacity crashed after 2.5 hours. Anyone know why this might have occurred, what to do about it, whether Audacity is in fact best for simple recording?
>> Timemachine may fit the bill. I once used it to record the proceedings of
>> a conference. Started it at 9:30 and let it run unsupervised until 18:00
>> or so. It did the job.
> Another vote for Timemachine. I've not used it for very long runs, but found it
> very lightweight, reliable and easy to use when transferring analogue tapes
> into the computer. Once done I then used Audacity to find and cut to the track
> boundaries.
>

-- 
David McQuire
0418 310312
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Sep 27 04:15:05 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 27 2014 - 04:15:05 EEST