Re: [LAU] Netjack questions

From: Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jan 12 2015 - 22:19:00 EET

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:10:09PM -0800, Russell Hanaghan wrote:

> I have a resident position at a local live venue haunt doing live sound. Nothing super fancy but we get a great variety of quality acts thru there.
>
> I need some more returns to the stage. Probably 2 for live monitors and maybe a cpl for I ear mixes. Rather than going for wired solutions, could u get the latency low enough on netjack to not be a nuisance over wireless? I could also run a single cat 5e or 6 and gig ports too I suppose. Easier than running 4 + shielded pair in this particular instance. Have several older laptops laying about.
>
> Is anyone doing something similar to success?

At work I've been using zita-njbridge with the default 10 ms buffering
over a wireless LAN. I don't think this can be repeated easily (I'm
working at Huawei Research so networks can be assumed to be performing
well). OTOH using a Cat6 cable and decent NICs this should just work.
Latency may still be too high for in-ear monitoring.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Jan 13 00:15:02 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 13 2015 - 00:15:02 EET