Re: [LAU] Netjack questions

~ Russell

> On Jan 12, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:10:09 -0800 Russell Hanaghan
> <hanaghan.osaudio@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> I have a resident position at a local live venue haunt doing live
>> sound. Nothing super fancy but we get a great variety of quality acts
>> thru there.
>>
>> I need some more returns to the stage. Probably 2 for live monitors
>> and maybe a cpl for I ear mixes. Rather than going for wired
>> solutions, could u get the latency low enough on netjack to not be a
>> nuisance over wireless? I could also run a single cat 5e or 6 and gig
>> ports too I suppose. Easier than running 4 + shielded pair in this
>> particular instance. Have several older laptops laying about.
>
> Isn't cat 5e "just" 4 shielded pairs? Might be worth a try to do a RJ45
> to XLR stagebox ;-)
>
> Other than that I wouldn't go the wireless route, shared medium is
> always asking for extra trouble. Especially when you have an audience
> of mobiles searching for the next wireless to connect to.

Agreed. If I did go wireless it would be with a dedicated router of my own. Hidden ssid, etc.
>
> - Arnold
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Jan 13 04:15:02 2015