Re: [LAU] Ardour Version Question: 2 versus 3?

From: Brent Busby <brent@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue May 05 2015 - 00:45:00 EEST

I switched from 2 to 3 after 3 had been out for awhile, but I found it
much more stable. Ardour 2 used to segfaullt if I zoomed in and out of
the timeline too much, and it experienced unexplainable xruns that never
happened so much in any other program. Everything got much more solid
when I went to v3. Yes, it does use more memory, so I suppose there is
that. I haven't tried v4 yet... so I can't really say about it.

-- 
+ Brent A. Busby	 + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ Sr. UNIX Systems Admin +  banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago	 +  eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ James Franck Institute +  Shakespeare.  Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ Materials Research Ctr +  we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue May 5 04:15:02 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 05 2015 - 04:15:02 EEST