Re: [LAU] Assumed you want to remove pulseaudio - Was: Diagnosing JACK

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Mon Oct 12 2015 - 21:04:01 EEST

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:52:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:33:19 +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>>On 10/10/2015 10:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> If somebody wants to get rid of pulseaudio, without recompiling,
>>> without dummy packages, then it doesn't harm to test if software
>>> really needs pulseaudio.
>>
>>And why do you think so little packages depend on PulseAudio?
>
>[rocketmouse@email-addr-hidden ~]$ pacman -Si |grep "Name :"|wc -l
>7947
>[rocketmouse@email-addr-hidden ~]$ pacman -Si |grep "Depends On :"|grep
>pulseaudio|wc -l 16
>[rocketmouse@email-addr-hidden ~]$ echo $((7947 - 16))
>7931

Sure, there are dependency chains, but AFAIK only for some packages
that belong to a minority of a few bloated desktop environments, so
reality is close to the just 16 packages out of 7947 packages. Other
distros split those 7947 packages by the factor of 8 and more packages,
so just one of that 8 packages could have a hard dependency to
pulseaudio, IOW the ratio for e.g. Debian and Ubuntu would be much
higher.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Oct 13 00:15:01 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 13 2015 - 00:15:01 EEST