On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:57:54 -0400, David Santamauro wrote:
>Nicely put ... but my comment was a response to: "If you want to play
>hobby music in the style of other artists some software tools make it
>easy to do so, but you never will find your individual style."
>
>So although I agree wholeheartedly with your statement above
>concerning the constraints of the tools, my point is/was, those
>constraints didn't hamper their ability to develop an individual style
>but, as you say above, were indeed their wellspring -- irrelevant how
>narrow we, in the 21st century view those individual styles.
I wrote much more and the reply was in a context related to:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:46:39 -0430, Luigino Bracci wrote:
>GarageBand have a huge bank of instruments, they sound really good and
>it is easy to use. Unfortunelly, it is difficult to install the bank of
>instruments ("soundfonts") in the open source applications I've tried,
>and most of them doesn't hace the quality in Garage Band.
I tried to explain that we need more information to solve this problem.
What Paul and you wrote has absolutely nothing to do with the question
of the OP and my explanation why even good soundfonts could sound less
good, then bad soundfonts.
Paul's and your emails aren't helpful, both of you completely miss the
problem the OP experiences.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Oct 27 20:15:02 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 27 2015 - 20:15:02 EET