I think that just about any combination these days will do the job MUCH
better than we imagined just a few years ago. I got a Gigabyte mobo a few
years ago with a Intel i5-4570 running at 3.20GHz. I sometimes sneak a look
at the cpu graphs and other than when I'm converting a video or something
equally cpu intensive, the graph seldom gets about 5% of use. And with 8gig
of RAM I don't think I've ever gone into swap.
My only complaint with the gigabyte board is that it doesn't recognize my
logictech "gaming" keyboard on boot. I think it might be the fact that it
has a usb port on the keyboard. So, if I want to access the bios I need to
plug in a different keyboard.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 00:14:47 +0100, Ede Wolf wrote:
> >That's why I personally went with AMD. No HT, no onboard/onchip Video.
>
> Take a look at the current models for current common sockets,
> especially the FM types. It seems that most of them have an integrated
> graphics. It seems to be a marketing concept that supersedes AMD CPUs
> without graphics soon.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
-- **** Listen to my FREE CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars **** Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA ** EMAIL: bob@email-addr-hidden WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Dec 20 08:15:01 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 20 2015 - 08:15:01 EET