Re: [LAU] Galvanic isolation (was: Re: pianos with built in recorders?)

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Fri Dec 25 2015 - 16:04:22 EET

On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 13:38:01 +0100, Yves Guillemot wrote:
>Le jeudi 24 décembre 2015, 11:48:07 Bob van der Poel a écrit :
>> I believe that the MIDI spec
>>
>> http://www.midi.org/techspecs/electrispec.php
>>
>> says that you must have a opto-isolator. Devices without one are
>> probably not compliment ... don't know about direct usb connections.
>>
>
>MIDI uses an unipolar signaling which is very sensitive to
>electromagnetic noises, in particular those ground loop generates.
>That's why MIDI standard requires an opto-coupler.
>
>USB uses a differential signaling and can works without any galvanic
>isolation.

Signal routes could be very tricky. A keyboard could be directly
connected by MIDI to the PC, but audio of the synth might be connected
to other gear and this gear is connected by audio to the PC. Galvanic
isolation and an open shielding always could make a difference. There's
also to keep in mind, that connections could be done by USB to MIDI DIN
adapters.

In the last 35 years music equipment became much cheaper, electronic
components became much better, but design of circuits and/or
carefulness of soldering and assembling became very worse. ISO 9000 is
just crap to provide good-for-nothing idiots a quality management
manager job to reduce quality, before that hype the quality of
circuit design and carefulness of soldering and assembling was much
better.

2 Cents,
Ral

-- 
http://www.grundgesetz-gratis.de/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Dec 25 16:15:02 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 25 2015 - 16:15:02 EET