On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:08:32 +0000
Harry van Haaren <harryhaaren@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:23 PM, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden
>> I have now tried 256 and it is quite good.
> "Good" depends on use case ;)
Absolutely, as I am now hearing. A synth sound that used to be OK now
has crackling noises here and there. It even has pitch alterations.The
synth does not like it at all. I would have to put it back to 1024 for
synth use. Then 256 for acoustic guitar recording. Closing all apps and
rebooting in between...
I really have to understand how this works. So, thanks again for the
information and the links. Much appreciated. Thanks to others who
have also replied.
> For curiosities sake, would you mind measuing the round-trip delay?
> (Assuming you have a loopback cable available and time :)
> I think you might be surprised... because I always am that its
> actually worse than we think, because I usually look at the software
> "theory" latency, instead of actually measuring :D
I will try it tomorrow. I'm curious about this.
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Feb 14 04:15:02 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 14 2016 - 04:15:02 EET