On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> That doesn't look right. I am not sure that changing this would fix
> your problem, but I prefer to have a different RTPRIO for anything
> above 50.
It has changed since that posting :)
RTIRQ_NAME_LIST="snd_ice1712"
PID CLS RTPRIO NI PRI %CPU STAT COMMAND
431 FF 90 - 130 1.6 S irq/18-snd_ice1
47 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/9-acpi
77 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/23-ehci_hcd
78 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/23-ehci_hcd
79 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/43-xhci_hcd
80 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/44-xhci_hcd
81 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/45-xhci_hcd
82 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/46-xhci_hcd
83 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/47-xhci_hcd
84 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/48-xhci_hcd
86 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/12-i8042
87 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/1-i8042
88 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/8-rtc0
157 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/50-ahci
170 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/51-i915
420 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/52-mei_me
427 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/53-snd_hda_
1096 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/49-eth0
[ksoftirqs snipped]
I wonder if it makes a difference if the rtc is so low, One of the web
pages that was provided here mentions that rtc should be first.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Feb 15 04:15:01 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 15 2016 - 04:15:01 EET