>> So, if one has a lot of things happening, multiple JACK
>> instances could make more use of available resources?
> I don't think that follows. That seems to me that you are asking if since
> you have a lot of processing going on, would adding additional overhead
> help.
What I want to do, is to use the resources I have to run multiple signal
generation and processing chains asynchronously, in parallel, and then
use the final audio-hardware-synchronized chain to resample them all
into one, perhaps using the Zita tools. Anyone know if this is
possible? I saw this flow structure work very well in the video domain,
quite a few years ago.
>
> If you have multiple processing chains that do not depend on one another,
> then using jack2 may help, it can take advantage of multiple processor
> cores.
JACK2 is indeed in use. Things are nowhere near as good under JACK1 in
this setup.
-- Jonathan E. Brickman jeb@email-addr-hidden (785)233-9977 Hear us at http://ponderworthy.com -- CDs and MP3 now available! <http://ponderworthy.com/ad-astra/ad-astra.html> Music of compassion; fire, and life!!!
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Feb 23 20:15:02 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 23 2016 - 20:15:02 EET