On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Robin Gareus wrote:
> Video is a lot more forgiving when it comes to timing and the modern CPU
> architecture is optimized for bandwidth.
>
> It can be entirely possible to reliably process 4K RGBA images in 40ms
> (25fps) ~900MB/s; while the same machine fails to process 128 audio
> samples in under 2ms (~256kB/s).
In general a delay of an extra 40ms frame or two doesn't matter either so
long as the sync lines up. I have watched a number of remote news bits
where the latency is ~1 second or more (which is disturbing BTW). I have
had better long distance phone call latency.
Ya, video and audio are two different animals.
-- Len Ovens www.ovenwerks.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Feb 24 00:15:04 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 24 2016 - 00:15:05 EET