Re: [LAU] Jack parallelism? Question.

From: Tim E. Real <termtech@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 25 2016 - 03:14:15 EET

On February 24, 2016 08:32:56 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2016 17:37, "Tim E. Real" <termtech@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Ie. Clients A B and C are connected in series but we want
> >
> > B to operate on A's processed data, and C to operate on B's
> > processed data, all in one cycle.
>
> That already happens in series in one cycle.

So no added latency for series clients?
OK good. Sorry, my mistake.

I know that hardware ports are another matter, though.

Thanks.
Tim.

> Surely the last thing you want
> if the clients are data dependent is this to happen in parallel?

>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> Neil C Smith
> Artist : Technologist : Adviser
> http://neilcsmith.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 25 04:15:01 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 25 2016 - 04:15:02 EET